AACE Estimate Classes: A Guide to Construction Cost Estimate Classes 1–5

AACE International's recommended practice (RP 17R-97 / 18R-97) defines five estimate classes that align estimate accuracy with how well a project's scope is defined. This guide compares Class 1 through Class 5 — what each is for, how accurate it should be, and when to use it.

What are AACE estimate classes?

The Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) classifies cost estimates by the maturity of project scope definition. The lower the class number, the more defined the scope and the tighter the expected accuracy range. Five primary characteristics drive the class: degree of project definition, end usage, estimating methodology, expected accuracy range, and preparation effort.

Comparison: Class 1 to Class 5

ClassScope MaturityTypical PurposeMethodologyAccuracy (Low)Accuracy (High)Effort
Class 50% – 2%Concept screening, feasibility, business caseStochastic / parametric, capacity factored, judgment−20% to −50%+30% to +100%Lowest (hours to a few days)
Class 41% – 15%Study or feasibility, concept selectionPrimarily stochastic, equipment factored, parametric models−15% to −30%+20% to +50%Low
Class 310% – 40%Budget authorization, funding, project control baselineMixed, but more deterministic — semi-detailed unit costs with assembly line items−10% to −20%+10% to +30%Moderate
Class 230% – 75%Control or bid/tender, change order pricingPrimarily deterministic, detailed unit cost with forced detailed take-off−5% to −15%+5% to +20%High
Class 165% – 100%Check estimate, bid/tender, definitive estimateDeterministic, detailed unit cost with detailed take-off−3% to −10%+3% to +15%Highest

Accuracy ranges are typical industry values from AACE RP 18R-97 (process industries) and 17R-97 (general). Actual ranges vary by sector, contingency allowances, and team experience.

Class 5 estimate (ROM)

A Class 5 estimate — often called a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) — is prepared when scope is essentially conceptual (0–2% defined). It is used for screening between alternatives, business-case development, and very early feasibility work. Methods rely on parametric models, capacity factors, historical analogies, and engineering judgment rather than line-item take-off. Expect a wide accuracy band (often −50% / +100%) and treat the number as a range, not a price.

Class 4 estimate

A Class 4 estimate supports concept-study and feasibility decisions with 1–15% scope definition. It still leans on parametric methods but introduces some equipment-factored estimating and early major-quantity take-offs. Useful for narrowing options before committing engineering hours.

Class 3 estimate

A Class 3 estimate is the budget-authorization estimate. With 10–40% scope definition, it blends deterministic line-item pricing with parametric fill-ins for undefined work. It typically becomes the project control baseline once funding is approved.

Class 2 estimate

A Class 2 estimate is a control or bid/tender estimate built on 30–75% scope definition. It is largely deterministic, with detailed unit costs and forced detailed take-off across most disciplines. It is the contractor's working estimate during construction.

Class 1 estimate

A Class 1 estimate is the most detailed: 65–100% scope definition, fully deterministic, with detailed take-off of every discipline. It is used as a check estimate, definitive bid, or change-order baseline. Only parts of a project are usually estimated to Class 1 because of the effort involved.

How to pick the right class

  • Match the class to the decision you need to make, not to how much time you have.
  • Document assumptions, exclusions, and basis-of-estimate alongside every class.
  • Carry explicit contingency that matches the class accuracy range.
  • Re-baseline as scope matures — a Class 5 ROM should not be reused as a Class 3 budget.

Build a structured Class 5 ROM

Precon ROM Builder turns rough early-stage scope notes into a structured AACE Class 5 planning ROM with assumptions, RFIs, exclusions, and risk flags.